SPEND THE WEEKEND WITH THE LEGENDS & PIONEERS OF
THE MODERN-DAY FREE ENERGY & TESLA SCIENCE MOVEMENT

TAKE NOTE THIS IS A 4 DAYS CONFERENCE NOW

July 5, 6, 7 & 8 of 2018

July 5, 6, 7 & 8 | Hayden, Idaho USA

2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE

Days

Hrs

Min

Sec

OVER 1000 PEOPLE ARE PRE-REGISTERED FOR 150 SEATS!!!

WE WILL START ACCEPTING PAYMENTS AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2017
FIRST COME FIRST SERVED

0% OF THE SEATS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE UNTIL NEXT YEAR

LIMITED TO 150 ATTENDEES
NO EXCEPTIONS

150 UNPAID SEATS LEFT!!!

14 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS
PLUS 2 PANEL DISCUSSIONS!!!

READ THE SPEAKER’S BIOS & TALK DESCRIPTIONS
http://energyscienceconference.com/2017-speakers/

FRIDAY SPEAKERS

WALT JENKINS

JAMES ROBITAILLE

RS STAFFORD

ERIC DOLLARD

JEFF MOE

SATURDAY SPEAKERS

AARON MURAKAMI

PROF. ROBERT HARALICK

PAUL LaVIOLETTE, PH.D

PAUL BABCOCK

AL FRANCOEUR

JEANE MANNING & SUSAN MANEWICH

SUNDAY SPEAKERS

AARON MURAKAMI

GEOFFREY MILLER

SPECIAL PRESENTER

PANEL DISCUSSION

Eagle’s Lodge, 1520 W Wyoming Ave, Hayden, ID 83835

REGISTER NOW

EMEDIAPRESS.COM

2015 ENERGY SCIENCE
& TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

THE 2015 CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS ARE HERE

Magnetic Energy Secrets Part 3 by Paul Babcock
MAGNETIC ENERGY SECRETS

The Dynaflux Concept and Lenz’s Law by Jim Murray
DYNAFLUX ALTERNATOR

The Power of the Aether as Related to Music and Electricity by Eric Dollard
POWER OF AETHER

Versor Algebra Volume II by Eric Dollard
This was not a conference presentation.
VERSOR ALGEBRA

Plasma Ignition for Wasted Spark Systems by Aaron Murakami
IGNITION SECRETS

The Lord’s Pump Project by Al Throckmorton
LORD’S PUMP PROJECT

Overunity Disclosure & Floyd Sweet’s VTA by Graham Gunderson
OVERUNITY DISCLOSURE

ECE Unified Theory of Physics by Douglas Lindstrom, PhD
ECE UNIFIED THEORY OF PHYSICS

On the Parallel Propulsion Researches of Tesla and J.J. Thomson by William Lyne
TESLA & JJ THOMSON

JULY 10, 11 & 12, 2015 – (Friday, Saturday & Sunday)

MORE SPEAKERS THAN EVER!
11 PRESENTERS
12 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS
PLUS A DISCUSSION PANEL

GET READY FOR SOME MORE POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS BY THE LEADING AUTHORITIES IN EXOTIC ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES

LOOK AT THE CURRENT SCHEDULE!
ENERGY CONFERENCE SCHEDULE

Seating will be limited to only 150 attendees
Attendees at former conferences get priority registration

FREE VIEWING!!!
PANEL DISCUSSION FOR THE
2014 ENERGY SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

The 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference was Historical!

9 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS

3 JAM-PACKED DAYS

More details will be posted but make sure to check out the BLOG so you can see the latest news about the speakers, their presentations and other updates.

Jim Murray
THE CONFERENCE IS JAM PACKED EVERY SINGLE TIME
SO REGISTER EARLY TO ENSURE YOUR SEAT!

The Energy Science & Technology Conference was originally called the Bedini-Lindemann Energy Science & Technology Conference.

John Bedini & Peter Lindemann have been champions of the exotic energy technology field for decades and responsible for much of the awareness in the modern-day free energy movement.

The Energy Science & Technology Conference is the only conference where a demonstration of overunity has been performed for everyone to see and analyze. At least year’s conference, John Bedini showed his popular SSG, but he had it modified so that the front side battery charged up as well. That means the wheel just kept spinning while nothing was being taken from the battery.

Some of the notable speakers who are part of this conference include John Bedini, Peter Lindemann, Eric Dollard, Paul Babcock, Jim Murray and others.

SEE ERIC DOLLARD IN ACTION!

This year, William Lyne, the author of Occult Ether Physics, will be joining the conference sharing his understanding of Tesla’s Ideal Flying Machine.

Aaron Murakami is the primary coordinator and organizer for the Energy Science & Technology Conference. He is also a founder of the very popular Energetic Forum and Energy Science Forum.

Bedini-Lindemann Conference

PRESENTATIONS THAT KEEP YOU GLUED TO THE CHAIR!

Aaron Murakami

If you would like to post a comment, please go to the appropriate page in the menu and comment on that page unless it is a general comment, question or suggestion about the Energy Science & Technology Conference, which is not addressed on the other pages.
- panos-san
  
  i never got these exotic energy guys and their followers. common sense dictates that if that knowledge you supposedly possess was valid the first that would like to take advantage of it, would be the big companies, and governments and the scientific community. since noone gives a damn, one can deduct you are selling nothing more than snakeoil to gullible people, giving them false hopes and expectations.
  - Aaron Murakami
    
    Frank looks like he answered you with the way the world actually works. There is no conspiracy theory here, this is business 101. The way a corporation sustains itself is not just one-time profits but by recurring profits from a product that a consumer has to purchase over and over and over. If a major publicly traded drug company announced they had a drug that could be injected one time and it would permanently cure any cancer, the stockholders would have their heads overnight for sabotaging the very point of having stock in a company that is supposed to grow and make them money. The same applies to energy companies. I agree with Frank, go do your research and study basic business economics before posting something that is so out of touch with reality. No major company will sabotage their huge recurring profit stream, period.
    - panos-san
      
      it is exactly this market competition that will lead some companies to look towards these alternatives, offering cheaper, more efficient services. this excuse you present to the people is good for 12 years old kids and conspiracy theory junkies, but not for any other thinking people. people would like life to be so simple. people would like for the cure of cancer to already exist and just be supressed. and this notion is fueled by hope. the exact same sentimental fallacy you people take advantage off. hope.
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        False – not when the oil/power companies have a monopoly on the power infrastructure – they have no reason to compete with each other with anything that sabotages that oil income. It’s really just common sense. GM has shelved thousands of patents – where are all those green energy technologies in the marketplace? On 2009 alone they filed for 1600 patents and over 600 were for green technologies that will sit there for years. They’re not doing anything with them because they have no reason to build engines that last longer, get more mileage, etc… These aren’t conspiracy theories, it’s called business and their business model is planned obsolescence so that parts wear out quicker by dirty running engines, etc… they have every patent necessary to solve virtually every issue and so do the other major auto manufacturers. You’re living in a fantasy world – there are many cures to many kinds of cancer and as a matter of documented fact. I’ve worked with plenty of MD’s who practice both allopathic and holistic medicine and have experience in that exact field. You need to learn what residual income means from MANAGING sickness and not curing it. We have sick care system in this country, not health care. There is no long term profit from curing disease and there is no long term profit from solving all the energy problems. Only a naive 12 year old would believe in such fantasies.
  - Anonymous
    
    Just a crab in a pot. That’s all panos-san is, a crab in a pot.
  - Michael Lanzaro
    
    “Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossible.”
    – Simon Newcomb, Astronomer and Mathematician (1835-1909)
    “Heavier than air flying machines are impossible.”
    – Lord Kelvin (William Thomson),Physicist and Engineer (1824-1907)
    The Wright brothers, two bicycle mechanics, had not one high school diploma between them, yet they persevered against all odds to make the impossible a reality. Most people place blind faith and trust in the hands of so called “experts”.
    What if Wilbur and Orville Wright had taken at face value the word of “experts” who said it couldn’t be done?
frank

common sense would dictate that if any alternate energy were made available to the public the oil and uranium holdings would drop by 100s of trillions of dollars // false claims and disinformation are the first line of attack // followed by the promise of huge wealth // if this does not work then force will be applied first to your family and then to you // ps in the late 40s SHELL OIL RESEARCH easily achieved 100 miles to a gallon PLEASE do some research and look it up
- panos-san
  
  we don’t have to look for exotic or overly advanced alternatives. just producing simple and clean hydrogen could do the job for most daily uses as fueling vehicles and sustainability for homes. so i guess all those alternative guys with rich fantasy should be more down to earth and strive towards more realistic goals and the perfection of already feasible technologies. like this guy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2p-JwqW2q8
  - Aaron Murakami
    
    You finally said something that makes sense, but it gives no validity to your other claims that are out of touch with reality. I have said for years that free energy is not needed to solve the world’s energy problems. If all homes in the US had a R100 insulation standard, then that would reduce home energy usage more than any other single modification and there is nothing exotic about it. Couple that with LED lighting, triple pane windows and a few other minor mods and the average home can reduce their energy usage by about 75% or more seeing that heating/cooling makes up 50% of the average bill.
    
    So many people want the sexy or exotic self running machine to solve everything – including myself, but I know it isn’t necessary.
    
    That doesn’t change the fact that legitimate overunity devices, cures to diseases, etc… are NOT welcome and the major corporations and their money has kept these solutions out of the marketplace…not because they don’t exist as you falsely claim, but because it is bad business for them…it’s really just common sense besides basic business accounting 101…dry up the residual income and they make 1 sale to 1 person – yeah, their stock holders are really going to dig that!
    - panos-san
      
      do you have any video of an overunity device actually working? of course you have to present all the parts, the blueprints and “anatomy” of the machine, and offer sufficient measurement data that suggest that it really produces more than it uses. i’m out of touch with reality? care to share with us how many money you have made by gullible people who “fund your research”…?
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        I fund my own research – collectively we are helping to fund Eric Dollard’s research, which has nothing to do with free energy so stop posting your disrespectful disinformation. Next time, you’ll simply be blocked.
        
        All details on this were revealed at http://energeticforum.com Self charging oscillator…
        
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDtXR_1Ubs8
        
        You need to look it up yourself…but you won’t be able to understand it since there are no provisions for this possibility in your mind, it is a waste of time to explain anything to you – you already have it all figured out and have nothing to learn. Good luck to you.
      - panos-san
        
        is there any journal or magazine that publishes such alternative papers?where do you guys publish? if you have publications that is…
      - Elliot Ness
        
        Having done three documentaries and interviewed scientists at UCLA, Stanford, UCSB, Harvard, Columbia etc, panos-san you’d be surprised what they have to say about innovation and how innovation happens. It starts, flickers and happens outside the establishment – whose incentive is purely disruption. I have looked at the line up of this conference and talked to a couple of speakers and they are pure scientists doing pure science. It’s interesting in and of itself to find out how they are viewing the issue, it opens new path. The info is available and open – the intention is good – rather than a blanket super establishment view (that not even the establishment holds) why not apply your skills to one of the issues of energy.
      - Tom
        
        Actually, Aaron, I’d love to see it too. My mind is open, and I’d like to know whether or not you actually are able to show us a simple video of an overunity device functioning, along with how-to’s, and in-depth proofs, etc. If you are such a maverick in this area, such a rogue, anti-corporate man of the people, freedom fighter, then I am your soldier waiting to be armed to assist you. Truly!
        
        I respectfully request proof of concept. Not redirections to books that I can pay people for, and not the “if you’re worthy, you’ll find the answers you seek” runaround. No, Aaron, if you show me exactly how to construct an overunity device, I swear to you I shall drop everything I am doing and construct it immediately after seeing the instructions. I mean everything I tell you with respect and admiration for your work. All I ask is for proof of the overuntiy devices you are aware of. The world needs them.
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        You epitomize the concept of contradiction. You ask for schematics, some are provided and you say that isn’t what you want. That’s ridiculous.
        
        You need to understand the principles, which have been given over and over. It isn’t a matter of whether or not it is here – it is a matter of whether or not you can give your permission to remove your blinders.
        
        Your other message you call us cons and here you say you have respect and admiration? Sound like a troll to me.
        
        This is elementary – let’s see if you get it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDtXR_1Ubs8 I have provided the details many times on the forum but nobody seems interested in a circuit that recharges it’s front input source (a capacitor) from the output, which is greater than the input.
      - ElaisaKasan
        
        Here is a video of a working device.
        http://pesn.com/2015/06/20/9602633_Why-Im-100-percent-sure_Roschs-KPP-Free-Energy-Technology_Works/
      - PA32R
        
        Lol @ “working device.” They chose not to/refused to actually do anything that might reveal that it doesn’t work. Stuart said “I’ve photographed it with my brand new thermal imager (a low end model) and I can’t find the cheat so it works.” Supposedly, electrical engineers brought test equipment from other countries but were so impressed visually that they thought that measurement would be a waste of time. Yeah, sure.
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        “Stuart said “I’ve photographed it with my brand new thermal imager (a low end model) and I can’t find the cheat so it works.”
        
        You are making fun of someone for using the EXACT SAME LOGIC you used in another post! LOL
        
        You said, “Yeah, except, of course, ya know, none of that stuff works. If it did, we’d all have purchased it and be using it.”
        
        You claim if something works we’d all be buying and using it while dismissing the reality that whether something works or not has ZERO to do with whether it is accepted and used.
        
        This is 100% IDENTICAL to you countering someone claiming something works just because they can’t find the cheat – while they are dismissing the reality that just because they can’t find the cheat doesn’t mean someone isn’t cheating.
        
        LOL – thanks for revealing yourself and your double standards. You conveniently use false logic in one post to make a point, while ridiculing someone else for using the same logic in a context with something you don’t agree with.
        
        Of course this mentality you are demonstrating is
      - PA32R
        
        Except for the fact that gravity is a conservative force. Moving balloons up and down is such a field can’t produce energy. In that case, the onus is on the claimants. I claim that if the devices you write about worked, we would be using them. Why would we not? I never claimed Stuart’s inability to find the cheat meant that they were cheating. I claim they are cheating regardless of Stuart’s inept investigation and that that investigation provided no significant counter evidence to that claim.
        
        Anyway, y’all have fun in your playpen.
      - ElaisaKasan
        
        The device is for sale:
        http://www.pureenergysystems.com/store/GAIA/AuKW/
      - endercase
        
        Is there a place online where these things are talked about freely?
      - ElaisaKasan
        
        Demo video:
        http://peswiki.com/index.php/Blog:GAIA's_AuKW_Demo
frank

aaron i consider it a privlige that you took the time to answer me , thank you and say hi to eric for me [for every advancement someone has to take the heat]
- Aaron Murakami
  
  Thank you, I will say hi!
Andrew Wright

For individuals that unfortunately cannot attend this conference, will there be the opportunity to purchase the presentations, videos?
- Luka
  
  yes i am very interested in this as well ! it would be nice if they were made available.
- Ray Greenmeresearch
  
  I agree, would like to have some pay-per-view options, saves me a trip from The Netherlands to the USA.
- Pieter Siegers
  
  There is, every year videos and presentations are released. You can purchase also the ones from earlier conferences which is great because some of the presenters have done series of talks.
- Pieter Siegers
  
  Ah didn’t see this was a 2 year ago post haha
linoavac

I am poor, from poor Portugal, i can not go. Please if possible, talk about “linoavac magnetic principle”
linoavac

I am poor, from poor Portugal, i can not go. Please if possible, talk about “linoavac magnetic principle”..thaks
linoavac

I am poor, from poor Portugal, i can not go. Please if possible, talk about “linoavac magnetic principle”..thaks very much
linoavac

I am poor, from poor Portugal, i can not go. Please if possible, talk about “linoavac magnetic principle”..thaks , if possible
Tom

“do you have any video of an overunity device actually working? of course you have to present all the parts, the blueprints and “anatomy” of the machine, and offer sufficient measurement data that suggest that it really produces more than it uses. i’m out of touch with reality? care to share with us how many money you have made by gullible people who “fund your research”…?”

-panos-san
————————————————————————————–

Aside from the rude, sarcastic overtones exuded by this person’s comment, I respectfully agree with him. Aaron, with respect, since when is the request for proof of concept to an inventor of any invention considered draconian, threatening or dissentious? it seems to me, that if you cannot even post a lengthy, in-depth video on any one of these overunity devices functioning, then you are attempting to deceive. I apologize, but it is logic.

It shouldn’t be much trouble for you, seeing as the entire purpose of this energy conference is to “get the free energy movement to the people” so to speak. From where I stand, it is quite simple: either these devices exist and are out there, being suppressed as I so much want to truly believe, or they are not. Its black and white. Furthermore, any advocate of these overunity devices claiming to be any sort of even a remote expert on the subject of overunity can only speak of their validity by means of displaying blatant proof of concept. Please, again with respect, just imagine for a second what would have happened if another group of famous underdog fringe scientists, bravely fighting the established system of beliefs, instead of staging a public demonstration of their technology, had gone around whispering to people in the darkness and among small-groups of “in crowd” members, “Hey… guess what… we invented a machine that carries people and flies… We call it an “airplane…” Oh wait, what..? Oh, you want to see it? You want me to prove that it works the way I say it does? Well, you are not trusting me. You must be part of the system that’s keeping us down. You don’t have any faith, and your mind is closed.”

I honestly want to believe in these scientific concepts and devices. I DO. I am fully open to the possibility that all of the physics we are taught in school, regarding the closed system and the laws of thermodynamics are a complete load of junk, and there is a giant conspiracy to continue to teach these outdated incorrect models of the universe out of fear of change in the world. But if I were a free energy inventor, the LAST thing I would ever DREAM of doing is to be stingy with my information. I would be looking for people, as frantically and feverishly as possible, to freely share in the joy I have created! I would be cautious, yes, but I would NOT refuse any man begging me for the truth. At last, by learning to build my device, people will NO longer be under the thumb of the global energy conspiracy! Why in the world, since there are so few of these free energy inventors, would they refuse to freely share their blueprints, ideas, and findings with as many people as they possibly could? That is how the movement would be driven: The technology itself should be totally understood, and IT would teach the people.

Please… prove my logic wrong. Make me a believer, I want to believe.
- Aaron Murakami
  
  Forgive me for not buying your emphasized sincerity, but…
  
  If your stance was logical, then it probably wouldn’t be wrong – therefore, your stance isn’t logical to begin with.
  
  Logic doesn’t dictate that someone needs to supply you with a video of the details of their work if it is real. If you believe that, you should study logic and not “free energy” because you don’t have a valid grasp of what logic even means.
  
  The conference is an “energy science & technology” conference, which means that you have the opportunity to have information on those topics conferred to you. That means you can actually learn something from someone who is sharing their knowledge and they wish to confer it to someone else. That is the literal purpose of a conference. As far as the topic, it isn’t a “free energy” conference, it is about the science of energy and what that means and technologies that are relevant to those teachings. Some of them are over 1.0 COP and they are not heat systems and they are very valid.
  
  You don’t need a schematic, you need to educate yourself on the basics of the premise of the claims to begin with because you are trying to analyze something through a set of eyes that are blind to a different set of operating principles.
  
  IF you are sincere and IF you are truly open to the fact that the conventional explanations are wrong, which they are, then why don’t you use your current belief system to engineer something outside of your belief system? Treat that like a Zen Koan and see what you come up with. Obviously, it is an effort in futility since it is an automatic contradiction and THAT is exactly what you are dealing with and why you are stating what you are stating.
  
  For starters, explain why a common refrigerator is doing more real measurable work in moving heat than can be accounted for in the electricity to run the compressor with electricity. That means more work is being done that we have to pay for, yet the refrigerator is still under 100% efficient. It is under 100% efficient, yet it produces more work than we pay for. Can you do that? Explain this and we can go from there because if you are unwilling or unable to know the distinctions here with this common example that is indisputable, then you really aren’t interested in learning anything that we are discussing and are really just trying to reinforce what you already believe.
  
  It is NOT my job or anyone else’s job to convince you of anything. It is YOUR job to do the work and figure out what you should believe on your own. If your current belief remains that is fine and if you see something else, that is fine too but at least YOU are in control of your own mind.
  
  IF you were a “free energy” inventor, you have no idea what you would do with the information because you are not a “free energy” inventor. If you want to talk about logic, you have to use logic and it is not logic to claim what you would do in a situation that you have no experience with. Logic is logic and fantasy is fantasy.
  
  Again, it is nobody’s job to prove anything to you except for yourself.
  - frank
    
    wow great example with the refrigerator , never knew it , wish it was common knowledge
    - Aaron Murakami
      
      You can see that it is actually very accepted in the mainstream that heat systems produce more than we have to pay to operate them. See this govt page: http://energy.gov/energysaver/articles/heat-pump-systems
      
      For example, an electrical resistor heating element is 100% efficient and is at a COP of 1.0. 100% of the electricity is thought to be converted to heat so it is 100% efficient in turning the electricity to heat. The output heat compared to our input is the COP ratio, which is 1.0.
      
      The govt site says, “A desuperheater-equipped heat pump can heat water 2 to 3 times more efficiently than an ordinary electric water heater.”
      
      So if an ordinary electrical heating element heater is 100% efficient and COP 1.0, the desuperheater heat pump system is a COP of 2.0 to 3.0 – or 200% to 300% the work completed compared to an electrical heater, which is already operating at 100% efficient.
      
      But the heat pump will have losses and the TOTAL output will probably be in the 90% range compared to TOTAL input – that is the efficiency since there are losses – but the total output compared to ONLY what we pay for is 2 to 3 times – a legitimate overunity system that doesn’t break any laws of physics.
      
      The Stiebel-Eltron best heat pump hot water heater is about COP 2.4 or 240% heat produced compared to our electrical input.
      
      If that heat pump hot water heater is in a room with a fairly high temperature, the COP can be as high as 7-8 or 700-800% compared to the electrical input since the heat input is free from the environment.
      - PA32R
        
        If a COP of 3 meant 300% efficiency, we could use the extra 200% to power the refrigerator, unplug it, and not have to pay for the electricity. The elementary confusion here regarding COP vs. thermodynamic efficiency speaks volumes as to the level of sophistication (actually, the lack thereof) of the participants. As to Frank, yes, all of those are sources but all work within well-understood physical principles and none put out more work than the energy input.
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        You’re simply not comprehending the facts. Efficiency is NOT COP. Almost every machine that is over 1.0 COP is UNDER 100% efficient. Efficiency is a ratio of TOTAL INPUT vs TOTAL OUTPUT. COP is a ratio of only OUR INPUT vs TOTAL OUTPUT – COP does NOT include free input from the environment. You are only proving that you have no comprehension of this entire topic.
      - PA32R
        
        No, EVERY machine that is over 1.0 COP is under 100% efficient. The heat coming out of the refrigerator is NOT output. There is no “free input from the environment.” From your writing here and elsewhere, I suspect that you’re quite well aware of that but admitting it doesn’t make the coin box jingle.
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        Heat leaving the refrigerator is WORK and is MORE than the WORK we pay for in electricity to move it, period.
      - PA32R
        
        No sense in replying to you further after this. You know that you’re f.o.s. and, eventually, others here will figure it out. Just like the tongue speaking, touch healing so-called charismatic preachers, it’s all in the presentation for you but, like them, the flock will move on. Unfortunately, a new one will likely come along.
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        Thanks for putting it on the record that you believe COP and efficiency are the same thing. Good luck to you.
      - PA32R
        
        Uh. I said the opposite. As you well know.
      - PA32R
        
        I very rarely resort to name calling in forums and comments to blogs, but, for having removed my comment where I stated that I’d said the opposite of what you claim I said and that you know that that’s the case, you are not only a charlatan, you’re a pussy.
    - PA32R
      
      Oh, for Heaven’s sake. The the COP rating of a refrigerator vs. its actual efficiency is such an elementary concept that I’m amazed you’d bring it up. A typical refrigerator with a COP of 3 might use 100 watts to remove 300 watts of thermal energy from inside the refrigerator to your kitchen. Does this mean that you have 200 watts of work has been done for free? It obviously does not. If it did, we’d all buy heat pumps, cool/heat our houses AND run our televisions while paying nothing to the electric utility.
      
      I’d be interested in which of the presenters no longer pays an electric bill.
      - frank
        
        what your elementary brain does not understand was that you can get more out than you put in without breaking any laws of conservation of energy // lightening , wind , tide , waterfall , the sun , magnetics , rotation of earth , rotation of electrons , the list goes on and on == work with nature , free energy is everywhere just waiting to be released // frank
      - Aaron Murakami
        
        Frank is 100% correct. Of course it means 200 watts worth of work in heat movement was done for free – that is the entire point of having a COP rating! A heat pump isn’t going to run your TV but that is the point of heat pumps is that they DO produce more work than we have to contribute.
        
        A non-heat pump resistive heating element water heater is 100% efficient and is a COP of 1.0. A heat pump can be easily 85% efficient, but has a COP of 3.0. COP defines EXACTLY the ratio of input work to output work and in the example you post about COP 3.0 is that – THAT is exactly what it means. Your input is 100 watts of WORK and you received 300 watts of WORK meaning 200 watts worth of work was done for free contributed by environmental input.
        
        This is completely understood and recognized in heat pump systems and you are arguing something that is actually accepted conventionally.
        
        The actual argument by conventional “science” is that this fact of over 1.0 COP is “supposed” to only apply to heat pumps. They deny it can happen with electrical or mechanical systems, but it can.
Bill Lyne

One of the main reasons over-unity/environmental energy products fail to make the market place is that there is an army of thieves out there stealing or sabotaging them by subterfuge. For example, I have been working with a northern European man for the past three years building my prototype which I know is over unity, but it is supposed to be MORE over unity, but someone has apparently gotten to him. I will have to seek enforcement of my non-disclosure contract through international theft-of-intellectual-property law. Once he got access to the last of my secrets he has failed to respond. I gave him a five-month deadline (until Dec. 1) because I suspected he has been dragging his feet. Meanwhile, I will be building the prototype myself according to my EXACT instructions (the European guy had some technical people in his family who thought they knew better, when ALL of the aspects of the invention have been fully verified scientifically using state of the art science).

Meanwhile, Aaron, I’m waiting for someone to pick me up at the Spokane Airport. Please check your email and respond so I know someone is coming!
- Aaron Murakami
  
  Glad everything worked out despite your flight coming in a few hours later than it was supposed to.
PA32R

Yeah, except, of course, ya know, none of that stuff works. If it did, we’d all have purchased it and be using it. Everyone is making money on donations, kickstarters, selling books describing their theories by which nothing is working, etc.
- Aaron Murakami
  
  That is like saying that if the govt took care of us, we would be supporting it by paying taxes. WAIT! We do pay taxes, yet the govt can hardly function effectively – your logic has nothing to do with how the real world works. There are many treatments for different diseases, but they are made illegal because curing someone is not profitable. The fact that something works has ZERO bearing on whether it is accepted or used and it never has.
  - PA32R
    
    So how’s your electric bill?
Bill Mundy

Great discussion. Hits the highlights of the challenges of developing energy systems that provide hope for mankind on planet Earth. No small topic, plenty of emotion behind it. Cool heads with much larger vision must prevail.

It really isn’t about COP or efficiency. Can you produce useful energy without consuming stuff? Yes, other than the hardware. Radio demonstrates that signals can be received without loading the transmission towers. Proof positive.
Can you do this with effective power systems? Yes. TC Heins with his BTTT demonstrated 4x power available by reducing the reverse power flow within a transformer core. If you can’t see that a transformer is an isolation device for circuits, let go of your habits and look carefully. Transformers are energy transmission systems. Follow the function of a transformer at the speed of light: Power in, open circuit output coil, no power out. Close the final loop on the output coil and magically more power returns to the core of the transformer than was input. It has been demonstrated that Kirchhoff’s law does not apply to field induction circuits. That excess power, because of its phase, cancels out the input power, forcing the power plant to respond with an increase in power. If the magnetic pulse generated by the load does not go back to the input coil, no reduction in power happens. His patent application was rejected because the US Patent Office is a private company owned by people who compete with this technology. They will not cut their monopoly and money making profiteering on false pretenses be undermind by anyone. As a private company, their reasons for supporting or denying patents is not a question of justice.
TC Heins has another patent application that was denied. He built an electric motor with flux-capacitors rather than typical inductors. His electric car motor powers itself and makes its own electricity. How? By integrating capacitance into the inductor windings, you get a phase shift of the induced electricity (the generating mode). That phase shifts the magnetic pulse of the inductor (stator winding) to assist the rotation of the magnetic rotor, not fight it (the motor function in action). You see, as EP Dollard pointed out, electric fields do not flow as electrons in conductors, they do it as fields in the insulators. Tesla built his coils with both capacitance and inductance. Not a new idea. But exposing the lie that capacitors have to have a break in the conductor to function, that is elegant application of real electrical theory, not the BS that is taught. Self-powered generators are real and easily made. TC Hein’s patent refused, not because it didn’t work, but because it should not work. Its all about leveraging the differences in natural potential, just like a water wheel. Its not about making power from nothing. Figure it out. You’ve been conned with the rest of the world for the last 100 years.
javaid shahbaz

I am looking forward to join the next ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 2016, And I hope that the presentations will be interactive. Powercom Audience Response Keypads also make conferences successful and interactive, so keep this in your mind.
ROBERTSTENECK

Gentlemen thank you anyway
Rock Dempsey

How can I contact Mike Waters?
Pieter Siegers

Don’t want to be rude, but why is John Bedini still announced as a speaker on Saturday?
Jesper Nissen

I am not able to attend this conference, does anybody know if there are other conferences like this in 2017?
Common Porpoise

THIS IS A PROVEN SCAM, DEVISED BY THE NOTORIOUS CONFIDENCE TRICKSTER NAIMA DAWN FEAGIN, WHO IS WANTED BY THE POLICE IN THE US AND IS CURRENTLY HIDING OUT IN MOROCCO. PLEASE DO NOT GIVE HER ANY MONEY UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. THANK YOU
Julie Nourish

I just purchased a RPX Bedini Generator from emediapress at this site Is http://sidebandgenerator.com/ site. Is this site legitimately selling the generators? I am concerned. I paid over $500 for the generator and no correspondence?

Join the Conference Updates List!

Recent Posts

This Is A Custom Widget

"Every living being is an engine geared to the wheelwork of the universe." - Tesla
REGISTER NOW

2017 ENERGY SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

SPEND THE WEEKEND WITH THE LEGENDS & PIONEERS OF
THE MODERN-DAY FREE ENERGY & TESLA SCIENCE MOVEMENT

TAKE NOTE THIS IS A 4 DAYS CONFERENCE NOW

July 5, 6, 7 & 8 of 2018

OVER 1000 PEOPLE ARE PRE-REGISTERED FOR 150 SEATS!!!

WE WILL START ACCEPTING PAYMENTS AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2017
FIRST COME FIRST SERVED

0% OF THE SEATS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE UNTIL NEXT YEAR

LIMITED TO 150 ATTENDEES
NO EXCEPTIONS

150 UNPAID SEATS LEFT!!!

14 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS
PLUS 2 PANEL DISCUSSIONS!!!

READ THE SPEAKER’S BIOS & TALK DESCRIPTIONS
http://energyscienceconference.com/2017-speakers/

FRIDAY SPEAKERS

SATURDAY SPEAKERS

SUNDAY SPEAKERS

LAST YEAR’S CONFERENCE
2016 ENERGY CONFERENCE VIDEOS
ARE LISTED HERE
HTTP://EMEDIAPRESS.COM

2015 ENERGY SCIENCE
& TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

MORE SPEAKERS THAN EVER!
11 PRESENTERS
12 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS
PLUS A DISCUSSION PANEL

GET READY FOR SOME MORE POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS BY THE LEADING AUTHORITIES IN EXOTIC ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES

FREE VIEWING!!!
PANEL DISCUSSION FOR THE
2014 ENERGY SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

The 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference was Historical!

9 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS

3 JAM-PACKED DAYS

Join the Conference Updates List!

Tags

Recent Posts

This Is A Custom Widget

2017 ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

SPEND THE WEEKEND WITH THE LEGENDS & PIONEERS OF THE MODERN-DAY FREE ENERGY & TESLA SCIENCE MOVEMENT

TAKE NOTE THIS IS A 4 DAYS CONFERENCE NOW

July 5, 6, 7 & 8 of 2018

OVER 1000 PEOPLE ARE PRE-REGISTERED FOR 150 SEATS!!!

WE WILL START ACCEPTING PAYMENTS AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2017 FIRST COME FIRST SERVED

0% OF THE SEATS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE UNTIL NEXT YEAR

LIMITED TO 150 ATTENDEES NO EXCEPTIONS

150 UNPAID SEATS LEFT!!!

14 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS PLUS 2 PANEL DISCUSSIONS!!!

READ THE SPEAKER’S BIOS & TALK DESCRIPTIONS http://energyscienceconference.com/2017-speakers/

FRIDAY SPEAKERS

SATURDAY SPEAKERS

SUNDAY SPEAKERS

LAST YEAR’S CONFERENCE 2016 ENERGY CONFERENCE VIDEOS ARE LISTED HERE HTTP://EMEDIAPRESS.COM

2015 ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

MORE SPEAKERS THAN EVER! 11 PRESENTERS 12 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS PLUS A DISCUSSION PANEL

GET READY FOR SOME MORE POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS BY THE LEADING AUTHORITIES IN EXOTIC ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES

FREE VIEWING!!! PANEL DISCUSSION FOR THE 2014 ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

The 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference was Historical!

9 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS

3 JAM-PACKED DAYS

Share this:

2017 ENERGY SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

SPEND THE WEEKEND WITH THE LEGENDS & PIONEERS OF
THE MODERN-DAY FREE ENERGY & TESLA SCIENCE MOVEMENT

WE WILL START ACCEPTING PAYMENTS AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2017
FIRST COME FIRST SERVED

LIMITED TO 150 ATTENDEES
NO EXCEPTIONS

14 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS
PLUS 2 PANEL DISCUSSIONS!!!

READ THE SPEAKER’S BIOS & TALK DESCRIPTIONS
http://energyscienceconference.com/2017-speakers/

LAST YEAR’S CONFERENCE
2016 ENERGY CONFERENCE VIDEOS
ARE LISTED HERE
HTTP://EMEDIAPRESS.COM

2015 ENERGY SCIENCE
& TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

MORE SPEAKERS THAN EVER!
11 PRESENTERS
12 POWERFUL PRESENTATIONS
PLUS A DISCUSSION PANEL

FREE VIEWING!!!
PANEL DISCUSSION FOR THE
2014 ENERGY SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE